Bidwai v. Solis

Fourth Circuit

Bidwai v. Solis

544 F. App'x 181

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 24, 2013

DocketNo. 13-1750

StatusPublished

This text of 544 F. App'x 181 (Bidwai v. Solis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bidwai v. Solis, 544 F. App'x 181 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Makarand Bidwai appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action alleging numerous statutory and constitutional violations for failure to state a claim and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion [182]*182for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bidwai v. Solis, No. 8:12-cv-03680-JFM (D. Md. Apr. 9 & June 3, 2013). We deny Bidwai’s motion for judicial notice. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Makarand Bidwai appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action alleging numerous statutory and constitutional violations for failure to state a claim and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion [182]*182for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bidwai v. Solis, No. 8:12-cv-03680-JFM (D. Md. Apr. 9 & June 3, 2013). We deny Bidwai’s motion for judicial notice. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

544 F. App'x 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bidwai-v-solis-ca4-2013.