Biddle v. Williams

Alabama Court of Appeals

Biddle v. Williams

187 So. 2d 806, 43 Ala. App. 246, 1966 Ala. App. LEXIS 489

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 14, 1966·Published

Opinion

PRICE, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal by Richard Brian Biddle from a judgment against him for $1200. Plaintiff filed a remittitur of $200.00 and motion for a new trial was overruled.

The defense was that the plaintiff was not the owner of the automobile driven by his son at the time of the collision with defendant’s car. The only insistence in brief is that the court in its oral charge misstated “the law by which the jury was to determine ownership.”

No exception was taken to the oral charge, therefore nothing is presented for appellate review. United Insurance Company of America v. Ray, 275 Ala. 411, 155 So.2d 514.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRICE, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal by Richard Brian Biddle from a judgment against him for $1200. Plaintiff filed a remittitur of $200.00 and motion for a new trial was overruled.

The defense was that the plaintiff was not the owner of the automobile driven by his son at the time of the collision with defendant’s car. The only insistence in brief is that the court in its oral charge misstated “the law by which the jury was to determine ownership.”

No exception was taken to the oral charge, therefore nothing is presented for appellate review. United Insurance Company of America v. Ray, 275 Ala. 411, 155 So.2d 514.

Affirmed.

Biddle v. Williams, 187 So. 2d 806, 43 Ala. App. 246, 1966 Ala. App. LEXIS 489 (Ala. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

187 So. 2d 806 (Biddle v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related