Biddle v. Williams

Alabama Court of Appeals

Biddle v. Williams

187 So. 2d 806, 43 Ala. App. 246, 1966 Ala. App. LEXIS 489

DecidedJune 14, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 187 So. 2d 806 (Biddle v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Biddle v. Williams, 187 So. 2d 806, 43 Ala. App. 246, 1966 Ala. App. LEXIS 489 (Ala. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PRICE, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal by Richard Brian Biddle from a judgment against him for $1200. Plaintiff filed a remittitur of $200.00 and motion for a new trial was overruled.

The defense was that the plaintiff was not the owner of the automobile driven by his son at the time of the collision with defendant’s car. The only insistence in brief is that the court in its oral charge misstated “the law by which the jury was to determine ownership.”

No exception was taken to the oral charge, therefore nothing is presented for appellate review. United Insurance Company of America v. Ray, 275 Ala. 411, 155 So.2d 514.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI