Biddle v. Walt

Eighth Circuit

Biddle v. Walt

287 F. 703, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 2378

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 26, 1923

DocketNo. 6127

StatusPublished

This text of 287 F. 703 (Biddle v. Walt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Biddle v. Walt, 287 F. 703, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 2378 (8th Cir. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

TRIEBER, District Judge.

These appellees were jointly indicted with Isadora Luvisch, No. 6125 (C. C. A.) 287 Fed. 699, and on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus discharged by the judgment of the court below.

The facts are identical with those in the Luvisch Case, and for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, filed this day, the judgment is reversed.

LEWIS, Circuit Judge, dissents. See Biddle v. Luvisch, 287 Fed. 699.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TRIEBER, District Judge.

These appellees were jointly indicted with Isadora Luvisch, No. 6125 (C. C. A.) 287 Fed. 699, and on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus discharged by the judgment of the court below.

The facts are identical with those in the Luvisch Case, and for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, filed this day, the judgment is reversed.

LEWIS, Circuit Judge, dissents. See Biddle v. Luvisch, 287 Fed. 699.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

287 F. 703, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 2378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/biddle-v-walt-ca8-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack