Biddle v. Walt

Eighth Circuit

Biddle v. Walt

287 F. 703, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 2378

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided February 26, 1923·No. No. 6127·Published

Opinion

TRIEBER, District Judge.

These appellees were jointly indicted with Isadora Luvisch, No. 6125 (C. C. A.) 287 Fed. 699, and on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus discharged by the judgment of the court below.

The facts are identical with those in the Luvisch Case, and for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, filed this day, the judgment is reversed.

LEWIS, Circuit Judge, dissents. See Biddle v. Luvisch, 287 Fed. 699.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TRIEBER, District Judge.

These appellees were jointly indicted with Isadora Luvisch, No. 6125 (C. C. A.) 287 Fed. 699, and on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus discharged by the judgment of the court below.

The facts are identical with those in the Luvisch Case, and for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, filed this day, the judgment is reversed.

LEWIS, Circuit Judge, dissents. See Biddle v. Luvisch, 287 Fed. 699.

Biddle v. Walt, 287 F. 703, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 2378 (8th Cir. 1923).

Pincite

287 F. 703 (Biddle v. Walt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related