Biddle Purchasing Co. v. United States

43 Cust. Ct. 399
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Biddle Purchasing Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 48 Cust. Ct. 251
United States Customs Court·Decided November 12, 1959·No. No. 63509; protests 324323-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty is not assessable upon the quantities of merchandise reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Biddle Purchasing Co. v. United States, 43 Cust. Ct. 399 (cusc 1959).

43 Cust. Ct. 399 (Biddle Purchasing Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Browne Vintners Co.
34 C.C.P.A. 112 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1946)