Biddle Purchasing Co. v. United States

23 Cust. Ct. 195, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1011
United States Customs Court·Decided November 1, 1949·No. No. 53674; protests 123107-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspectors as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspectors as “manifested, not found,” is subject to an allowance in duties. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Biddle Purchasing Co. v. United States, 23 Cust. Ct. 195, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1011 (cusc 1949).

23 Cust. Ct. 195 (Biddle Purchasing Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.