Bicknell v. Evatt

Ohio Supreme Court

Bicknell v. Evatt

45 N.E.2d 415, 140 Ohio St. 492, 140 Ohio St. (N.S.) 492, 24 Ohio Op. 501, 1942 Ohio LEXIS 479

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 9, 1942

Docket29235

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 45 N.E.2d 415 (Bicknell v. Evatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bicknell v. Evatt, 45 N.E.2d 415, 140 Ohio St. 492, 140 Ohio St. (N.S.) 492, 24 Ohio Op. 501, 1942 Ohio LEXIS 479 (Ohio 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

The appellants having elected to file a verified summary of their federal income tax return as authorized by Section 5372-2, General Code, the Board of Tax Appeals properly refused to receive or consider the return made under Section 5388, General Code, or apply the “income yield” measure defined in Section 5389, General Code. Feld v. Miller et al., Tax Commission, 139 Ohio St., 378, 40 N. E. (2d), 421; Deeds v. Evatt, Tax Commr., 138 Ohio St., 567, 37 N. E. (2d), 581. Í

No constitutional question set forth in the assignments of error was argued orally or in the brief of appellants. Under Section 12223-21, General Code, errors not argued by brief may be disregarded.

*494 The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is neither unreasonable nor unlawful.

Decision affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias, Hart and Zimmerman, JJ., concur. Bell, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI