Bicknell v. Bicknell

14 So. 2d 664, 153 Fla. 354, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 630
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedAugust 3, 1943
StatusPublished

This text of 14 So. 2d 664 (Bicknell v. Bicknell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bicknell v. Bicknell, 14 So. 2d 664, 153 Fla. 354, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 630 (Fla. 1943).

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

On this appeal from a final decree, it appears there was a . conflict in the testimony on the controlling issues in the case. Most of the testimony, including that of the parties, was taken before the chancellor in person. He was in a much better position to judge the weight and credibility of the testimony than is this Court. There were also some letters and other written exhibits. The chancellor’s conclusions and final decree are supported by the record. It certainly is not made to appear that this decree is clearly erroneous.

Affirmed.

*355 TERRELL, BROWN, CHAPMAN, THOMAS, ADAMS and SEBRING, JJ., concur. BUFORD, C. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 So. 2d 664, 153 Fla. 354, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bicknell-v-bicknell-fla-1943.