Bickley v. State

255 S.E.2d 31, 243 Ga. 488, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 954
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 6, 1979
Docket34654
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 255 S.E.2d 31 (Bickley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bickley v. State, 255 S.E.2d 31, 243 Ga. 488, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 954 (Ga. 1979).

Opinion

Undercofler, Presiding Justice.

We are asked to instruct the Court of Appeals concerning the following certified questions: (1) "In all misdemeanor cases which may be prosecuted in superior court, in which the district attorney has the authority to prefer accusations, does Code § 27-704 as amended, which is silent on the subject, require that the accusation be supported by affidavit?” and (2) "Does § 27-704 as *489 amended apply to those courts falling within the provisions of the State Court Act of 1970 (Ga. L. 1970, pp. 679, 680; Code Ann. Ch. 24-21A)?” We answer both questions in the affirmative.

Submitted March 2, 1979 Decided April 6, 1979. Judson R. Knighton, for appellant. Herbert A. Rivers, Solicitor, Stephen Schuster, Assistant Solicitor, for appellee.

1. "The power to try misdemeanors is conferred by statute, with the specified waiver by the accused; but the trial must be upon accusation founded upon affidavit. Affidavit is essential, and if the instrument treated by the court and the parties as an affidavit be void, there is no foundation for the proceedings; the whole trial is a nullity ...” Scroggins v. State, 55 Ga. 380, 382 (3) (1875); Martin v. State, 139 Ga. App. 8 (1) (228 SE2d 15) (1976); Faulkner v. State, 146 Ga. App. 604, 606-607 (2) (247 SE2d 147) (1978).

2. The procedure authorized in Code Ann. § 27-704 for hearing charges tried upon accusations would also be applicable to state courts where pertinent. See the "State Court Act” 1 (Ga. L. 1970, pp. 679-682, p. 681, Sec. 8; Code Ann. § 24-2107a).

Certified questions answered in the affirmative.

All the Justices concur.
1

This Act is entitled "Practice and Procedure, etc.,in Certain Courts Below Superior Court Level.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blankenship v. State
431 S.E.2d 481 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)
State v. Scoggins
397 S.E.2d 50 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)
State v. Doyal
361 S.E.2d 17 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
McSears v. State
273 S.E.2d 847 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1981)
Stone v. State
260 S.E.2d 405 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)
Holland v. State
259 S.E.2d 187 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)
Bickley v. State
258 S.E.2d 306 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)
Morris v. State
257 S.E.2d 549 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 S.E.2d 31, 243 Ga. 488, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bickley-v-state-ga-1979.