Bickler v. Tofany

38 A.D.2d 940, 331 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5214

This text of 38 A.D.2d 940 (Bickler v. Tofany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bickler v. Tofany, 38 A.D.2d 940, 331 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5214 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Proceeding dismissed on [941]*941the merits and respondent’s determination confirmed, with costs. On the record presented, it is our opinion that there is substantial proof to sustain the determination. Munder, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Shapiro, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 A.D.2d 940, 331 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bickler-v-tofany-nyappdiv-1972.