Bicklemeyer v. Lackawanna Steel Co.

174 A.D. 902, 159 N.Y.S. 1100
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bicklemeyer v. Lackawanna Steel Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 170 A.D. 168

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., and Herrell, J., who dissented upon the grounds stated in dissenting memorandum of Kruse, P. J., on former appeal (reported 170 App. Div. 168).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bicklemeyer v. Lackawanna Steel Co., 174 A.D. 902, 159 N.Y.S. 1100 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

174 A.D. 902 (Bicklemeyer v. Lackawanna Steel Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bicklemeyer v. Lackawanna Steel Co.
170 A.D. 168 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)