Bickle v. Swartz

Indiana Supreme Court

Bickle v. Swartz

34 Ind. 53

DecidedNovember 15, 1870

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Ind. 53 (Bickle v. Swartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bickle v. Swartz, 34 Ind. 53 (Ind. 1870).

Pincite

Opinion

Worden, J.

There is but one assignment of error in this cause, and that relates to the exclusion of certain evidence offered by the appellant on the trial of the cause.

There is no error assigned in the overruling of the motion for a new trial.

The error .assigned raises no question for our considera[54]*54tion. Whitinger v. Nelson, 29 Ind. 441; Herrick v. Bunting, id. 467; Smith v. Crigler, id. 516.

W. A. Bickle and J. P. Siddal, for appellant. C. C. Binckley and W. Morrow, for appellee.

The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Worden, J.

There is but one assignment of error in this cause, and that relates to the exclusion of certain evidence offered by the appellant on the trial of the cause.

There is no error assigned in the overruling of the motion for a new trial.

The error .assigned raises no question for our considera[54]*54tion. Whitinger v. Nelson, 29 Ind. 441; Herrick v. Bunting, id. 467; Smith v. Crigler, id. 516.

W. A. Bickle and J. P. Siddal, for appellant. C. C. Binckley and W. Morrow, for appellee.

The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Ind. 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bickle-v-swartz-ind-1870.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack