Bickham v. Denny

1 N.J.L. 14
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 15, 1790·Published

Opinion

Pee Churiam.

Let a procedendo issue. A man shall not be permitted in this manner to defeat a measure to which he [15]*15has consented, and which has been made a rule of court. A habeas corpus is too late after interlocutory judgment.

Eule absolute.

Note. — See the case of Sharp v. Sinnickson, post. See also Wyate v. Markham, Barnes 121; 2 Sellon’s Prac. 268; 1 Tidd’s Prac. 338-9.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bickham v. Denny, 1 N.J.L. 14 (N.J. 1790).

1 N.J.L. 14 (Bickham v. Denny) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.