Bickford v. Rich
This text of 105 Mass. 340 (Bickford v. Rich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant, having been adjudged trustee of the plaintiff, and having paid upon the judgment against him twenty-five dollars, is by the express provisions of the statute discharged from all demand by the plaintiff to the amount of such payment. Gen. Sts. c. 142, § 37. The plaintiff is not entitled to any judgment, unless he shows that some amount is due him for interest upon the bill against the defendant, which has accrued since this suit was commenced. It does not appear that the bill due by the defendant bore interest by reason of any contract or promise to pay interest. On the contrary, the agreed statement finds that “ any interest that may be due is due as damages resulting from nonpayment, or the delay in payment.” This being so, the case of Oriental Bank v. Tremont Insurance Co. 4 Met. 1, is decisive against the plaintiff’s claim of interest. The defendant has not promised to pay interest; he was prevented by the law from paying the principal; and he is in no fault for not pay . ing it, and ought not to be charged with interest as damages for nonpayment. Judgment for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
105 Mass. 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bickford-v-rich-mass-1870.