Bickenbach v. Maurmann
This text of 187 P. 406 (Bickenbach v. Maurmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Automobiles owned and driven by the respondent and appellant, respectively, came into collision at the corner of 17th and Market streets, in the city of Tacoma, on the evening of November 18, 1918. Each claims that the other was driving in a careless manner and that such carelessness was the occasion of the collision. The matter was submitted on testimony by both sides to the trial court, who found the facts in favor of the respondent.
A reading of the record does not show that the facts preponderate against the finding of the trial court. For that reason we will not disturb the result.
Some objection is made to the testimony as to the matter of damages, the claim being that the experts called on behalf of the respondent were not properly qualified. We find no merit in this point, and affirm the judgment of the lower court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
187 P. 406, 110 Wash. 699, 1920 Wash. LEXIS 954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bickenbach-v-maurmann-wash-1920.