Bick v. Bleecker

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Bick v. Bleecker

107 N.Y.S. 29

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 29, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 107 N.Y.S. 29 (Bick v. Bleecker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bick v. Bleecker, 107 N.Y.S. 29 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appears from the record that the defendant is the owner of a number of push carts which he rents. One was rented by the plaintiff, and, not being returned by him, the defendant went to the market and found and took the cart. There was some fruit in the cart belonging to the plaintiff when the defendant took it, for the value of which plaintiff sued. There is no competent evidence of the value of the fruit, except that given without objection by the defendant and his witness, which fixes it at $2.

The judgment should be reduced to the sum of $2, and $5 costs in the court below, and affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appears from the record that the defendant is the owner of a number of push carts which he rents. One was rented by the plaintiff, and, not being returned by him, the defendant went to the market and found and took the cart. There was some fruit in the cart belonging to the plaintiff when the defendant took it, for the value of which plaintiff sued. There is no competent evidence of the value of the fruit, except that given without objection by the defendant and his witness, which fixes it at $2.

The judgment should be reduced to the sum of $2, and $5 costs in the court below, and affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 N.Y.S. 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bick-v-bleecker-nyappterm-1907.