Bibi Shagoofa v. Nazir Ahmad Eshaqzi
This text of Bibi Shagoofa v. Nazir Ahmad Eshaqzi (Bibi Shagoofa v. Nazir Ahmad Eshaqzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case 8:22-cv-01824-FWS-JDE Document 21 Filed 02/07/23 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:105
__________________________________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.: 8:22-cv-01824-FWS-JDE Date: February 7, 2023 Title: Bibi Shagoofa v. Nazir Ahmad Eshaqzi et al.
Present: HONORABLE FRED W. SLAUGHTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Melissa H. Kunig N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Not Present Not Present
PROCEEDINGS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION
Plaintiff Bibi Shagoofa (“Plaintiff”) was ordered to file a Notice of Submission by February 3, 2023, indicating that a completed summons, USM-285 form(s), and copies of the Complaint were submitted to the U.S. Marshal’s Service. (Dkt. 20.) As of the date of this Order, the court has received no further filings from Plaintiff and the February 3, 2023, deadline for filing a Notice of Submission has now passed. (See generally Dkt.)
Accordingly, the court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than February 14, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Failure to adequately comply with the court’s order may result in dismissal. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629 (1962) (“The authority of a federal trial court to dismiss a plaintiff’s action with prejudice because of his failure to prosecute cannot seriously be doubted.”); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005) (“[C]ourts may dismiss under Rule 41(b) sua sponte, at least under certain circumstances.”); Ash v. Cvetkov, 739 F.2d 493, 496 (9th Cir. 1984) (“It is within the inherent power of the court to sua sponte dismiss a case for lack of prosecution.”).
Initials of Deputy Clerk: mku
____________________________________________________________________________ CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL 1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bibi Shagoofa v. Nazir Ahmad Eshaqzi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bibi-shagoofa-v-nazir-ahmad-eshaqzi-cacd-2023.