Bibbs v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bibbs v. State

469 S.W.3d 505, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 887, 2015 WL 5239774

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 8, 2015·No. No. ED 101673·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Brandon Bibbs appeals from the motion court’s denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 amended motion for post-conviction relief claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Brandon Bibbs appeals from the motion court’s denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 amended motion for post-conviction relief claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Bibbs v. State, 469 S.W.3d 505, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 887, 2015 WL 5239774 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

469 S.W.3d 505 (Bibbs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.