Bibbs v. State
This text of 702 So. 2d 627 (Bibbs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant files an appeal from his convictions for attempted burglary of an occupied structure and possession of burglary tools. We find no error as to the conviction and sentence, but we do find that costs were imposed in violation of the rules enumerated in Bradshaw v. State, 638 So.2d 1024, 1025 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Therefore, we affirm the conviction and sentence, but strike that portion of the final judgment imposing costs, and remand for the trial court to impose costs in accordance with the dictates of Bradshaw.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
702 So. 2d 627, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14563, 1997 WL 775107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bibbs-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.