Bibbins v. Noxon
4 Wend. 207
This text of 4 Wend. 207 (Bibbins v. Noxon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bibbins v. Noxon, 4 Wend. 207 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1830).
Opinion
By the Court,
The variance is fatal, the defendant having put the judgment in issue by his plea of nul tiel record. Had the judgment been mere matter of inducement, the variance might have been disregarded ; but in this case it cannot be overlooked. It cannot be cured by a remititur; for that must be before judgment. (Strange, 1170. 4 T. R. 560.) The defendant is entitled to judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gooding v. Hingston
20 Mich. 439 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1870)
Douglass v. Garrett
5 Wis. 85 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1856)
Pritchett v. Clark
5 Del. 63 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1848)
Blakey v. Saunders
9 Mo. 733 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1846)
Pierce v. Van Dyke
6 Hill & Den. 613 (New York Supreme Court, 1844)
Griffin v. Ganaway
6 Ala. 148 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1844)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Wend. 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bibbins-v-noxon-nysupct-1830.