Bibbins v. Noxon

New York Supreme Court

Bibbins v. Noxon

4 Wend. 207

New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1830·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

The variance is fatal, the defendant having put the judgment in issue by his plea of nul tiel record. Had the judgment been mere matter of inducement, the variance might have been disregarded ; but in this case it cannot be overlooked. It cannot be cured by a remititur; for that must be before judgment. (Strange, 1170. 4 T. R. 560.) The defendant is entitled to judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

The variance is fatal, the defendant having put the judgment in issue by his plea of nul tiel record. Had the judgment been mere matter of inducement, the variance might have been disregarded ; but in this case it cannot be overlooked. It cannot be cured by a remititur; for that must be before judgment. (Strange, 1170. 4 T. R. 560.) The defendant is entitled to judgment.

Bibbins v. Noxon, 4 Wend. 207 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1830).

Pincite

4 Wend. 207 (Bibbins v. Noxon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related