Bibb v. McQueen
This text of 42 Ala. 408 (Bibb v. McQueen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence which was admitted against the objection of the appellant, was merely redundant, and could not have affected the rights of either party. Its admission was, therefore, at most, erroneous without being injurious. Bishop v. Blair, 36 Ala. 80.
It results that the judgment of the court must be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 Ala. 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bibb-v-mcqueen-ala-1868.