Bibb v. McQueen

42 Ala. 408
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 15, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 42 Ala. 408 (Bibb v. McQueen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bibb v. McQueen, 42 Ala. 408 (Ala. 1868).

Opinion

BYRD, J.

1. At the maturity of the bill, the appellee being a resident of the State of Florida, notice of the dishonor of the bill was properly sent by post to the drawer, according to the law merchant. No usage or custom of the bank was necessary to be established to authorize the mode in which the notice was sent.— Gindrat v. The Merchant’s Bank of Augusta, 7 Ala. 324.

The evidence which was admitted against the objection of the appellant, was merely redundant, and could not have affected the rights of either party. Its admission was, therefore, at most, erroneous without being injurious. Bishop v. Blair, 36 Ala. 80.

2. The appellant asked two charges which were refused. The court committed no error in its refusal to give them.

It results that the judgment of the court must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carter v. Odom
121 Ala. 162 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1898)
Shelton v. Carpenter
60 Ala. 201 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1877)
Philipe v. Harberlee
45 Ala. 597 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1871)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 Ala. 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bibb-v-mcqueen-ala-1868.