Bibb County Loan Ass'n v. Richards

21 Ga. 592
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1857
DocketNo. 108
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 21 Ga. 592 (Bibb County Loan Ass'n v. Richards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bibb County Loan Ass'n v. Richards, 21 Ga. 592 (Ga. 1857).

Opinions

By the Court.

Lumpkin, J.

delivering the opinion.

My first purpose was to consider two questions only, viz: 1st. Is the act of incorporation constitutional and valid? And, 2d. Did the charter authorize the contract from which Richards seeks to be relieved ?

Reflecting, however, upon the novelty and importance of the matters involved in this case, and the learning exhibited in its discussion, I have concluded to take a more extended view of the points in controversy.

From a work published in 1854, by Mr. A. Cummings, Jr., Boston, upon Building Associations, it seems that these associations originated with the Earl of Selkirk, in Scotland, in 1815. The motives of their founder were purely benevolent, and the experiment was eminently successful on account of the beneficial influence they exerted upon the industrious classes; they soon attracted- the attention of the British public; and they have spread and multiplied in that country, to an incredible extent. In 1836, the British Parliament passed an act, affording the most ample facilities for their formation and control.

In the year 1836, twenty-one years after the first one was established in Great Britain, the first association of this kind, called " The Brooklyn Building and Mutual Loan Fund Association,” was organized in Brooklyn, New York; and from that time they have continued to spread from State to State, and City to City, until at present, they pervade every [596]*596portion of the Union. They number already some sixteen in Georgia. That they have improved our towns by leading to the erection of a number of new buildings, furnished many families with homes of their own, that could not otherwise have possessed them; given a considerable impulse to mechanical enterprize, and in many other ways promoted the prosperity and welfare of the communities where they exist, is undoubtedly true. But whether they will continue to' be entitled to the epithet of the “ poor man’s exchequer,” and whether they will, as they promise to do, enable every man to become his own landlord, will depend entirely upon the manner in which they conduct their business. Under existing regulations, I have been led seriously to doubt this. The interest of the borrower, as well as the accumulator, will have to be sedulously regarded and protected; otherwise they will forfeit the public confidence and cease to prosper. If all the members were borrowers, and such was the original idea upon which these associations were founded, the plan would work well. But in every such association, a large number of the stockholders do not join with the view of taking loans, but /or the purpose of investing their money where it will yield a profitable return. These are called accumulators; while they share in the profits of the institution, they contribute nothing to produce them; and asa necessary consequence, the borrowers have to pay a larger interest to make a given rate of dividends, than they would, if they produced these dividends only for themselves.

To those who feel curious to investigate this subject more thoroughly, I would refer them to a small volume published in Charleston in 1852, on the “Mutual Benefit of Building and Loan Association and also to a book recently published in Connecticut, which is replete with all the learning upon this mysterious scheme. And to which is added by the author who was two years a Director of one of' those associations, a model plan for their management; the opera[597]*597tions of which he confidently believes, will secure results uniformly equitable to all parties.

This is a brief outline of the origin of Building and Loan Associations. Their- friends and advocates who claim for them an antiquity older than the Chistian era, insist that they are peculiarly propitious to the poor, by stimulating them to save small sums from the grog-shop and the gambling house, and to purchase with their hoarded earnings, happy homes for themselves and families; and that the terms upon which they procure help for this purpose, are such as they could get no where else; and not so hard as those exacted by monied men who will not give long indulgence to any, especially those in straitened circumstances. That another object which they subserve is, to supply a place of safe deposit for the savings of the stockholder in which they are entitled to receive lawful interest, which is not allowed by Banking and other corporations.

On the other hand, it is asked, why so much complication and mystery about a system designed for the benefit of the masses, especially the poor and the humble ? That it is all for the purpose of concealing the repulsive interest which they charge. That nothing can be understood of its workings, except that it produces most gratifying gains to the capitalist who invests his money in it to accumulate. That the borower once in the web may, like the little fly, struggle in vain, to escape the entanglement. That the roof which he hoped would have sheltered him, crumbles beneath the mortgage that overspeads it. That the sooner these institutions are abolished the better.

I here dismiss these preliminary observations, leaving the utility and danger of Building and Loan Associations to puzzle wiser heads than mine, as they have done hitherto.

The following is the Constitution and By-laws of the Bibb County Loan Association, by which it was incorporated,

[598]*598Constitution of the Bibb County Loan Association, adopted June 9th, 1854.

Rules. — 1st. Reading and taking action on minutes of previous meeting.

2d. At 8½ o’clock from. April to September, inclusive, and at 7½ o’clock from October to March, inclusive, the business of loaning shall commence, and continue until all the funds on hand are disposed of.

3d. Loans shall be sold as follows: $1,000 shall be put up, and the successful bidder shall be privileged to take the lesser sum of 800, 600,400 or 200 dollars, at his option.

4th. The successful bidders shall be required to hand in to the Secretary, on the night of meeting, the number of the lot, and description of the property proposed to be mortgaged.

Note. — It is expected, that members being successful bidders, will present their papers to the Solicitor for examination, within twenty-four hours after the monthly meeting.

Officers. — A. R. Freeman, President j T. R. Bloom, Daniel F. Clark, E. C. Granniss and J. M. Boardman, Directors ; W. S. Williford, Treasurer and Secretary ; Lanier & Anderson, Solicitor.

Constitution.

Article i. — Title and Object. — This Association shall be entitled the Bibb County Loan Association, and shall have for its object, the accumulation of a fund, by the monthly subscriptions or savings of the members thereof, to assist them in procuring for themselves, such real estate as they may deem desirable.

Article ii. — Members.—Section 1. Any persons legally qualified to hold property may become members of this Association.

Section 2. Each stockholder, for each share of stock by him or her held, shall pay the sum of one dollar in par funds, on subscribing, and the same amount on or before 6 o’clock, p. m., of the third Thursday of each and every month there[599]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hopkins Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cleary
296 U.S. 315 (Supreme Court, 1935)
Gibson v. State
106 So. 231 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)
Southern Railway Co. v. Lancaster
100 S.E. 380 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1919)
Cooper v. Newton
160 F. 190 (U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia, 1908)
Atlanta Savings Bank v. Spencer
33 S.E. 878 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. State
31 S.E. 531 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Cook v. Equitable Building & Loan Ass'n
30 S.E. 911 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Smoot v. Peoples Perpetual Loan & Building Ass'n
41 L.R.A. 589 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1898)
Mathis v. State
31 Fla. 291 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1893)
Reeve v. Ladies' Building Ass'n
18 L.R.A. 129 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1892)
Patterson v. Workingmen's Building & Loan Ass'n
82 Tenn. 677 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1885)
Pfeister v. Wheeling Building Ass'n
19 W. Va. 676 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1882)
Parker v. United States Building, Land & Loan Ass'n
19 W. Va. 769 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1882)
Montgomery Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. Robinson
69 Ala. 413 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1881)
Mechanics' & Farmers' Building & Loan Ass'n v. Dorsey
15 S.C. 462 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1881)
Seay v. Bank of Rome
66 Ga. 609 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1881)
Cincinnati German Building Ass'n No. 3 v. Flach
1 Cin. Sup. Ct. Rep. 468 (Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati, 1871)
Tuskaloosa Bridge Co. v. Olmstead
41 Ala. 9 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1867)
Ex parte Pollard
40 Ala. 77 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1866)
Bonds v. Allen
25 Ga. 343 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1858)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 Ga. 592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bibb-county-loan-assn-v-richards-ga-1857.