Biancalana, Joseph Agostino Iv

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 17, 2021
DocketWR-92,181-01
StatusPublished

This text of Biancalana, Joseph Agostino Iv (Biancalana, Joseph Agostino Iv) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Biancalana, Joseph Agostino Iv, (Tex. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-92,181-01

EX PARTE JOSEPH AGOSTINO BIANCALANA, IV, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. A18719-1 IN THE 216TH DISTRICT COURT FROM KERR COUNTY

Per curiam. KELLER , P.J., filed a concurring opinion in which HERVEY and SLAUGHTER , JJ., joined. YEARY , J., concurred.

OPINION

Applicant pleaded guilty to aggravated kidnapping in this case. At the same time, he pleaded

guilty to charges of tampering with evidence also from Kerr County, and aggravated kidnapping,

possession of a controlled substance and aggravated robbery from Gillespie County. Applicant was

sentenced to twenty-eight years’ imprisonment for each of the aggravated kidnapping charges and

the aggravated robbery charge, ten years’ imprisonment for the tampering with evidence charge, and

two years’ state jail for the possession of a controlled substance charge, all to run concurrently. He

did not appeal his convictions. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the

county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC . 2

art. 11.07.

Applicant contends, among other things, that his convictions for aggravated kidnapping from

both Gillespie and Kerr Counties based on the same acts violate the prohibition on double jeopardy.

Based on the record, the trial court has determined that Applicant’s two convictions for

aggravated kidnapping involving the same acts violate the prohibition on double jeopardy. The trial

court has determined that Applicant’s other grounds for review are without merit. We agree.

Relief is granted. Ervin v. State, 991 S.W.2d 804, 817 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). The

judgment of the 216th Judicial District Court of Kerr County in Cause No. A18719 is set aside. All

other relief is denied. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal

Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: March 17, 2021 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ervin v. State
991 S.W.2d 804 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Biancalana, Joseph Agostino Iv, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/biancalana-joseph-agostino-iv-texcrimapp-2021.