Biamonte v. State

139 So. 3d 445, 2014 WL 2206958, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8071
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 28, 2014·No. No. 2D13-6093·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Richardson, 915 So.2d 86 (Fla.2005); Hughes v. State, 22 So.3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Waiter v. State, 965 So.2d 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Teal v. State, 862 So.2d 871 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Greenlee v. State, 591 So.2d 310 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Middleton v. State, 721 So.2d 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

DAVIS, C.J., and CRENSHAW and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Biamonte v. State, 139 So. 3d 445, 2014 WL 2206958, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8071 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

139 So. 3d 445 (Biamonte v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

WAITER v. State
965 So. 2d 861 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Greenlee v. State
591 So. 2d 310 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Hughes v. State
22 So. 3d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
State v. Richardson
915 So. 2d 86 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
Middleton v. State
721 So. 2d 792 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Teal v. State
862 So. 2d 871 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)