Bialeck v. Bialeck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bialeck v. Bialeck

235 A.D. 801

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D. 801 (Bialeck v. Bialeck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bialeck v. Bialeck, 235 A.D. 801 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, as resettled, denying motion to dismiss the complaint upon the ground of lack of jurisdiction, and to vacate order of sequestration and appointment [802]*802of receiver, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Defendant may answer within ten days from service of a copy of the order herein. Appeal from order dated January 22,1932, dismissed, without costs, as unnecessary in view of the entire question involved being presented by the appeal from the resettled order. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, as resettled, denying motion to dismiss the complaint upon the ground of lack of jurisdiction, and to vacate order of sequestration and appointment [802]*802of receiver, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Defendant may answer within ten days from service of a copy of the order herein. Appeal from order dated January 22,1932, dismissed, without costs, as unnecessary in view of the entire question involved being presented by the appeal from the resettled order. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D. 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bialeck-v-bialeck-nyappdiv-1932.