Bi-State Pools v. United Baptist Church

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bi-State Pools v. United Baptist Church

249 S.W.3d 278, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 479, 2008 WL 927576

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 8, 2008

DocketED 90239

StatusPublished

This text of 249 S.W.3d 278 (Bi-State Pools v. United Baptist Church) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bi-State Pools v. United Baptist Church, 249 S.W.3d 278, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 479, 2008 WL 927576 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment denying its motion to set aside a judgment. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI