BI-LO, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent

Fourth Circuit

BI-LO, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent

386 F.2d 834, 67 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2075, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4305

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 4, 1967·No. 11351_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The petition of Bi-Lo, Inc., operator of a retail food store chain in and around Greenville, South Carolina, states it is aggrieved by a final order of the National Labor Relations Board, 163 NLRB No. 138, April 12, 1967, and asks that it be set aside. Section 10(f) Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160 (f). The Board’s answer prays the order’s enforcement. We think the Board should prevail.

As a whole, the evidence cannot be appraised as failing to furnish substantial undergirding for the Board’s findings and conclusions. It found undue inquisition and surveillance of the employees’ union interest, and the firing of three employees for union sponsorship. Denials of these charges — originated by the Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, Local 442, AFL-CIO — were made, but the Board resolved all the traverses against the employer. Within the Board’s prerogative, the decision cannot now be disturbed.

Order enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The petition of Bi-Lo, Inc., operator of a retail food store chain in and around Greenville, South Carolina, states it is aggrieved by a final order of the National Labor Relations Board, 163 NLRB No. 138, April 12, 1967, and asks that it be set aside. Section 10(f) Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160 (f). The Board’s answer prays the order’s enforcement. We think the Board should prevail.

As a whole, the evidence cannot be appraised as failing to furnish substantial undergirding for the Board’s findings and conclusions. It found undue inquisition and surveillance of the employees’ union interest, and the firing of three employees for union sponsorship. Denials of these charges — originated by the Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, Local 442, AFL-CIO — were made, but the Board resolved all the traverses against the employer. Within the Board’s prerogative, the decision cannot now be disturbed.

Order enforced.

BI-LO, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, 386 F.2d 834, 67 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2075, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4305 (4th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

386 F.2d 834 (BI-LO, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related