Bhoolai v. State

114 So. 3d 207, 2012 WL 4838982, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17760
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 12, 2012
DocketNo. 5D11-4079
StatusPublished

This text of 114 So. 3d 207 (Bhoolai v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bhoolai v. State, 114 So. 3d 207, 2012 WL 4838982, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17760 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, without discussion, the trial court’s denial of Vidya Bhoolai’s (“Bhoo-lai”) motion to withdraw plea. Because Bhoolai failed to challenge her sentence below, we do not consider her claim(s) of sentencing error. See Jackson v. State, 983 So.2d 562 (Fla.2008) (sentencing errors must be presented by contemporaneous objection or through a rule 3.800 motion). Our affirmance is without prejudice to Bhoolai seeking relief below pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800.

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. State
33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 357 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 So. 3d 207, 2012 WL 4838982, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bhoolai-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.