Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bhoj v. State

Bhoj v. State

172 So. 3d 564, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12525, 2015 WL 4945011
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 21, 2015
DocketNo. 5D14-3930
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 172 So. 3d 564 (Bhoj v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bhoj v. State, 172 So. 3d 564, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12525, 2015 WL 4945011 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Deodat Bhoj appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850. We reverse for the court to strike Bhoj’s motion and permit him an opportunity to amend his motion pursuant to Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007). We remand to the trial court to allow Bhoj to amend his motion to state a facially sufficient claim, if it is possible for him to do so. See Pierre v. State, 973 So.2d 547 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

LAWSON, C.J., ORFINGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mederos-Morales v. State
222 So. 3d 1234 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Jorge Mederos-Morales v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 So. 3d 564, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12525, 2015 WL 4945011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bhoj-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.