BHB Skylake Corp. v. Paul

Florida Circuit Courts

BHB Skylake Corp. v. Paul

1 Fla. Supp. 2d 73

CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida

DecidedAugust 20, 1981

Docket80-323-AP

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Fla. Supp. 2d 73 (BHB Skylake Corp. v. Paul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

BHB Skylake Corp. v. Paul, 1 Fla. Supp. 2d 73 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Before KNIGHT, SMITH & DURANT.

This appeal is from a Final Judgment in which the trial Court awarded Appellee $150.00 plus costs. On consideration of the record, briefs, and argument of counsel, we find merit in«Appellant’s contentions that an agreement for the sale of real property, which has merged into a subsequent purchase agreement, cannot be rescinded, Dix v. Dix, 191 So.205 (Fla. 1939), and that there is no requirement under Florida law that a developer build a condominium unit in accordance with its building plan unless deviations from such plan rise to the level of breach of warranties. David v. B & J Holding Corp., 349 So.2d 676 (Fla.3d DCA 1977). Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Before KNIGHT, SMITH & DURANT.

This appeal is from a Final Judgment in which the trial Court awarded Appellee $150.00 plus costs. On consideration of the record, briefs, and argument of counsel, we find merit in«Appellant’s contentions that an agreement for the sale of real property, which has merged into a subsequent purchase agreement, cannot be rescinded, Dix v. Dix, 191 So.205 (Fla. 1939), and that there is no requirement under Florida law that a developer build a condominium unit in accordance with its building plan unless deviations from such plan rise to the level of breach of warranties. David v. B & J Holding Corp., 349 So.2d 676 (Fla.3d DCA 1977). Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Fla. Supp. 2d 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bhb-skylake-corp-v-paul-flacirct-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack