BHB Operating, Inc. and Lance Duncan Individually and D/B/A Mark III Energy Holdings, LLC v. Roberts Interests, LLP

Court of Appeals of Texas

BHB Operating, Inc. and Lance Duncan Individually and D/B/A Mark III Energy Holdings, LLC v. Roberts Interests, LLP

DecidedAugust 18, 2016

Docket11-15-00287-CV

StatusPublished

This text of BHB Operating, Inc. and Lance Duncan Individually and D/B/A Mark III Energy Holdings, LLC v. Roberts Interests, LLP (BHB Operating, Inc. and Lance Duncan Individually and D/B/A Mark III Energy Holdings, LLC v. Roberts Interests, LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

BHB Operating, Inc. and Lance Duncan Individually and D/B/A Mark III Energy Holdings, LLC v. Roberts Interests, LLP, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

BHB Operating, Inc. and Lance Duncan * From the 70th District individually and d/b/a Mark III Energy Court of Ector County, Holdings, LLC, Trial Court No. A-139,387.

Vs. No. 11-15-00287-CV * August 18, 2016

Roberts Interests, LLP, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has considered the motion for remand filed by Roberts Interests, LLP, and we conclude that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we reverse the judgment of the trial court, and we remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against the party incurring same.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

BHB Operating, Inc. and Lance Duncan * From the 70th District individually and d/b/a Mark III Energy Court of Ector County, Holdings, LLC, Trial Court No. A-139,387.

Vs. No. 11-15-00287-CV * August 18, 2016

Roberts Interests, LLP, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has considered the motion for remand filed by Roberts Interests, LLP, and we conclude that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we reverse the judgment of the trial court, and we remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against the party incurring same.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

BHB Operating, Inc. and Lance Duncan Individually and D/B/A Mark III Energy Holdings, LLC v. Roberts Interests, LLP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bhb-operating-inc-and-lance-duncan-individually-and-dba-mark-iii-energy-texapp-2016.