Bhatti v. Roche
140 A.D.2d 660, 528 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6125
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 31, 1988·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
"Summary judgment is a drastic remedy which should not be granted where there is any doubt about the existence of a triable issue of fact” (Sherman v Town of Rhinebeck, 133 AD2d 77, 78). The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. There exist triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants represented that the real property in question could be subdivided and whether, in fact, the real property in question may be subdivided. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bhatti v. Roche, 140 A.D.2d 660, 528 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).
140 A.D.2d 660 (Bhatti v. Roche) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Balkarran v. Sitts
2026 NY Slip Op 30002(U) (New York Supreme Court, Schenectady County, 2026)
St. Barnabas Hospital v. Government Employees Insurance Co.
55 Misc. 3d 785 (New York Supreme Court, 2017)
Fontana v. New Econo Laundromat Inc.
51 Misc. 3d 510 (New York Supreme Court, 2016)
County of Nassau v. Bassen
14 Misc. 3d 633 (New York Supreme Court, 2006)
Lane v. McCallion
166 A.D.2d 688 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)