Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Bhatti v. Roche

Bhatti v. Roche

140 A.D.2d 660, 528 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6125
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 31, 1988
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 140 A.D.2d 660 (Bhatti v. Roche) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bhatti v. Roche, 140 A.D.2d 660, 528 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

"Summary judgment is a drastic remedy which should not be granted where there is any doubt about the existence of a triable issue of fact” (Sherman v Town of Rhinebeck, 133 AD2d 77, 78). The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. There exist triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants represented that the real property in question could be subdivided and whether, in fact, the real property in question may be subdivided. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Balkarran v. Sitts
2026 NY Slip Op 30002(U) (New York Supreme Court, Schenectady County, 2026)
St. Barnabas Hospital v. Government Employees Insurance Co.
55 Misc. 3d 785 (New York Supreme Court, 2017)
Fontana v. New Econo Laundromat Inc.
51 Misc. 3d 510 (New York Supreme Court, 2016)
County of Nassau v. Bassen
14 Misc. 3d 633 (New York Supreme Court, 2006)
Lane v. McCallion
166 A.D.2d 688 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 A.D.2d 660, 528 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bhatti-v-roche-nyappdiv-1988.