Bhallieu v. Horschowski
112 A. 263, 95 Conn. 694, 1921 Conn. LEXIS 33
This text of 112 A. 263 (Bhallieu v. Horschowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bhallieu v. Horschowski, 112 A. 263, 95 Conn. 694, 1921 Conn. LEXIS 33 (Colo. 1921).
Opinion
The verdict was rendered on conflicting evidence. If the jury believed the plaintiff’s version of how the injuries for which he sues occurred, rather than that of the defendant, their verdict was justified, since reasoning men might reasonably have reached the conclusion the jury did. The appeal is wholly without merit.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
112 A. 263, 95 Conn. 694, 1921 Conn. LEXIS 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bhallieu-v-horschowski-conn-1921.