Bhagat v. Shah
Opinion
THE ALBER FIRM —— PC. — 21 Walt Whitman Road Huntington Station, New York 11746 Telephone: 631-333-1600 Facsimile: 631-333-1670 http://www. □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ This letter motion (ECF 204) and the motion filed at ECF 203 will k discussed at the telephone conference already scheduled for Thursday, May 1, 2025 at 11:30 AM. Defendant Shah is expected VIA ECF □ te fhe attend notwithstanding her counsel's filing of a letter (ECF 203) a: The Honorable Robyn F. Tarnofsky ired b . 4 ECE 193: ECF 195 United States District Court required by my prior orders ( ’ ) ORDERED Southern District of New York □□□ 500 Pearl St. Dated: April 29, 2025 _ haw” New York, NY 10007 New York, NY aes □□ Re: Viral Bhagat v. Anuja Sharad Shah a/k/a Anu Shah, No. 1:24-CV-01424-VEC Subject: PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO DISCLOSE DAMAGES AND IMPLICATIONS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION Dear Magistrate Judge Tarnofsky: Please be advised that our firm represents Defendant, Anuja Sharad Shah, in the above-referenced action. I write respectfully to seek the Court’s intervention concerning Plaintiff Viral Bhagat’s persistent and inexcusable failure to substantiate the $3.5 million in damages he claims — damages that are the sole basis for invoking this Court’s diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Plaintiff’s dereliction has prejudiced Defendant’s ability to prepare for imminent depositions and threatens the orderly and fair administration of these proceedings. Despite nearly a year of litigation and extensive written discovery, Plaintiff has produced no credible evidence supporting his fantastical damages claim. Plaintiff alleges "catastrophic" financial harm stemming from his termination at Meta; yet he admits he obtained new employment within a matter of months. To date, Plaintiff has refused to produce: (1) employment offer letters from subsequent employers; (11) any proof of lost earnings or salary differentials; any documentation of mitigation efforts; (iv) any expert analysis quantifying economic loss; or (v) any medical or psychological records substantiating anything beyond garden-variety emotional distress.
THE ALBER FIRM — PC. — 21 Walt Whitman Road Huntington Station, New York 11746 Telephone: 631-333-1600 Facsimile: 631-333-1670 http://www.alberlegal.com/WWW.ALBERLEGAL.COM Put simply, Plaintiff has put his alleged $3.5 million in damages at issue and has stonewalled discovery on that central claim. Defendant cannot meaningfully proceed with depositions or trial preparation without clarity on the alleged injuries Plaintiff seeks to recover. The federal diversity statute requires more than mere allegations — it requires a good faith basis, supported by evidence, that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. See, e.g., St. Paul Mercury Indem. Co. v. Red Cab Co., 303 U.S. 283, 288-89 (1938). The record here strongly suggests that Plaintiff manufactured his $3.5 million damages figure solely to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, without any legitimate factual basis. This Court has both the power and the duty to scrutinize and, if necessary, dismiss where jurisdiction is lacking. Accordingly, Defendant respectfully requests that the Court: 1. Compel Plaintiff to immediately provide a complete damages computation, with itemized figures tied to each cause of action, and produce all supporting documentation (including employment, salary, financial, and medical records); 2. Require Plaintiff’s compliance within seven (7) days of the Court’s Order; 3. Preclude Plaintiff from introducing any damages evidence at deposition or trial if he fails to comply; 4. Dismiss or remand this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction should Plaintiff fail to substantiate a good-faith claim exceeding $75,000. Given that depositions are scheduled to commence on May 16, 2025, Defendant respectfully requests expedited consideration of this application. We thank the Court for its attention to this important matter. Respectfully, Lawrence Katz
Lawrence Katz, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant THE ALBER FIRM, P.C. 21 Walt Whitman Road Huntington Station, NY 11746 Phone: (631) 333-1600
THE ALBER FIRM — PC. — 21 Walt Whitman Road Huntington Station, New York 11746 Telephone: 631-333-1600 Facsimile: 631-333-1670 http://www.alberlegal.com/WWW.ALBERLEGAL.COM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bhagat v. Shah (Bhagat v. Shah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.