Bhadar Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.

444 F. App'x 931
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 22, 2011
Docket10-70995
StatusUnpublished

This text of 444 F. App'x 931 (Bhadar Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bhadar Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr., 444 F. App'x 931 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Bhadar Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen proceedings based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Singh v. Gonzales, 491 F.3d 1090, 1095 (9th Cir.2007), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Singh’s motion to reopen where the motion was filed nearly eleven years after the BIA’s final order of removal, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Singh did not establish that he exercised due diligence during the entirety of this time period, as required to obtain equitable tolling of the filing deadline, see Singh, 491 F.3d at 1096-97.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
444 F. App'x 931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bhadar-singh-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2011.