B&H National, Inc. v. Beresford

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided March 27, 2012·No. Civil Action No. 2010-0855·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) B&H NATIONAL PLACE, INC., et ai., ~ Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, ~ ) Civil Case No. 10-855 (RJL) v. ) ) CHARLES BERESFORD, et ai., ) Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ) ) ) v. ) BYUNG KWON CHO & HANA CHO, ) ) Third-Party Defendants. ) )~ ORDER (March~, 2012) .fL.. For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this~ day of March, 2012, it is hereby

ORDERED that the defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment [#51 and #52] are GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that the plaintiffs and third-party defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [#62] is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part; and it is further

ORDERED that final judgment be entered for the defendants on all counts in the Amended Complaint; and it is further

ORDERED that final judgment be entered for the plaintiffs and third-party defendants on Five Guys Enterprises, LLC's counterclaims and third-party claims.

SO ORDERED.

United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

B&H National, Inc. v. Beresford, (D.D.C. 2012).

B&H National, Inc. v. Beresford (B&H National, Inc. v. Beresford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.