B&H National, Inc. v. Beresford
This text of B&H National, Inc. v. Beresford (B&H National, Inc. v. Beresford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) B&H NATIONAL PLACE, INC., et ai., ~ Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, ~ ) Civil Case No. 10-855 (RJL) v. ) ) CHARLES BERESFORD, et ai., ) Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ) ) ) v. ) BYUNG KWON CHO & HANA CHO, ) ) Third-Party Defendants. ) )~ ORDER (March~, 2012) .fL.. For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this~ day of March, 2012, it is hereby
ORDERED that the defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment [#51 and #52] are GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED that the plaintiffs and third-party defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [#62] is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part; and it is further
ORDERED that final judgment be entered for the defendants on all counts in the Amended Complaint; and it is further
ORDERED that final judgment be entered for the plaintiffs and third-party defendants on Five Guys Enterprises, LLC's counterclaims and third-party claims.
SO ORDERED.
United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
B&H National, Inc. v. Beresford, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bh-national-inc-v-beresford-dcd-2012.