Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/B.G. v. State

B.G. v. State

529 So. 2d 354, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1915, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3631, 1988 WL 82514
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 9, 1988
DocketNo. 88-334
StatusPublished

This text of 529 So. 2d 354 (B.G. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
B.G. v. State, 529 So. 2d 354, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1915, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3631, 1988 WL 82514 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

On Agreed Motion To Remand For New Adjudicatory Hearing

PER CURIAM.

Inasmuch as the record below cannot be reconstructed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(3) or otherwise, the judgment below is vacated and the agreed motion to remand for a thus required new adjudicatory hearing is granted. Marks v. Wertalka, 475 So.2d 273 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Van Scoyoc v. York, 173 So.2d 483 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965), cert. denied, 179 So.2d 214 (Fla.1965); Rosenkrantz v. Hall, 161 So.2d 673 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosenkrantz v. Hall
161 So. 2d 673 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Van Scoyoc v. York
173 So. 2d 483 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Marks v. Wertalka
475 So. 2d 273 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
529 So. 2d 354, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1915, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3631, 1988 WL 82514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bg-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.