B.G. v. State
529 So. 2d 354, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1915, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3631, 1988 WL 82514
Opinion
On Agreed Motion To Remand For New Adjudicatory Hearing
Inasmuch as the record below cannot be reconstructed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(3) or otherwise, the judgment below is vacated and the agreed motion to remand for a thus required new adjudicatory hearing is granted. Marks v. Wertalka, 475 So.2d 273 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Van Scoyoc v. York, 173 So.2d 483 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965), cert. denied, 179 So.2d 214 (Fla.1965); Rosenkrantz v. Hall, 161 So.2d 673 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
B.G. v. State, 529 So. 2d 354, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1915, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3631, 1988 WL 82514 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
529 So. 2d 354 (B.G. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rosenkrantz v. Hall
161 So. 2d 673 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Van Scoyoc v. York
173 So. 2d 483 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Marks v. Wertalka
475 So. 2d 273 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)