BF v. Florida Department of Children and Family Services

929 So. 2d 620, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7069
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 10, 2006·No. 3D05-1603·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

929 So.2d 620 (2006)

B.F., Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, Appellee.

No. 3D05-1603.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 10, 2006.

Joseph M. Albury, for appellant.

Calianne P. Lantz, for appellee.

Before GREEN, FLETCHER, and RAMIREZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment terminating the mother's parental rights given that the judgment was supported by clear and convincing evidence and that termination was the least restrictive means of protecting the minor child. See J.R. v. Dept. of Children and Families, 754 So.2d 714 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)(affirming termination of parental rights where clear and convincing evidence showed that mother failed to substantially comply with case plan); In re T.M., 641 So.2d 410, 412-13 (Fla. 1994)(least restrictive means analysis requires only that state prove good faith effort to rehabilitate parent and unify family by providing case plan and related services).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BF v. Florida Department of Children and Family Services, 929 So. 2d 620, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7069 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

929 So. 2d 620 (BF v. Florida Department of Children and Family Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CG v. Department of Children and Families
67 So. 3d 1141 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
C.C. v. Department of Children & Families
994 So. 2d 1231 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
CC v. Department of Children and Families
994 So. 2d 1231 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Echevarria v. State
929 So. 2d 620 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)