B.F. v. AMS Staff Leasing

54 So. 3d 502, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 16540, 2010 WL 4273365
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 29, 2010
DocketNo. 1D10-2688
StatusPublished

This text of 54 So. 3d 502 (B.F. v. AMS Staff Leasing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
B.F. v. AMS Staff Leasing, 54 So. 3d 502, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 16540, 2010 WL 4273365 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER ON APPELLANTS MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE

PER CURIAM.

Claimant filed a Motion to Transfer Venue of this underlying workers’ compensation appeal to the Third District Court of Appeal citing Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.040(b)(1), which authorizes a transfer of venue “[i]f a proceeding is commenced in an inappropriate court.” Because Florida law requires that appellate review of workers’ compensation cases shall be by this court, we deny the motion.

Specifically, section 440.271, Florida Statutes (2010) requires that “[r]eview of any order of a judge of compensation claims entered pursuant to this chapter shall be by appeal to the District Court of Appeal, First District.” In addition, the supreme court, in Rollins v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co., 384 So.2d 650 (Fla.1980), held this court is a constitutionally permissible venue for workers’ compensation appeals because the agency charged with monitoring and supervising workers’ compensation claims is headquartered in Tallahassee.

Currently, the workers’ compensation law is administered by the Department of Financial Services, the Agency for Health Care Administration, the Office of Insurance Regulation, the Department of Education, and the Division of Administrative Hearings, all of which are headquartered in Tallahassee. § 440.015, Fla. Stat. (2010). Accordingly, we find no basis to grant Claimant’s request to change venue as the appeal has been filed in the appropriate court.

DENIED.

WOLF, ROBERTS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rollins v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co.
384 So. 2d 650 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 So. 3d 502, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 16540, 2010 WL 4273365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bf-v-ams-staff-leasing-fladistctapp-2010.