Beyers v. Thrane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Beyers v. Thrane

245 A.D.2d 288, 665 N.Y.S.2d 944, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12078

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 1, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 245 A.D.2d 288 (Beyers v. Thrane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beyers v. Thrane, 245 A.D.2d 288, 665 N.Y.S.2d 944, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12078 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to the Uniform Support of Dependents Law (Domestic Relations Law art 3-A), the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), entered November 19, 1996, which denied his objections to an order of the same [289]*289court (Ekadis, H.E.), entered June 4, 1996, which, after a hearing, directed him to pay weekly child support in the sum of $67.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the father’s contention, the hearing was in substantial compliance with the directives of Domestic Relations Law § 37 (see, Matter of Adams-Eppes v Fulton, 195 AD2d 455; Matter of Williams v Williams, 133 AD2d 876).

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Santucei and Lerner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to the Uniform Support of Dependents Law (Domestic Relations Law art 3-A), the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), entered November 19, 1996, which denied his objections to an order of the same [289]*289court (Ekadis, H.E.), entered June 4, 1996, which, after a hearing, directed him to pay weekly child support in the sum of $67.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the father’s contention, the hearing was in substantial compliance with the directives of Domestic Relations Law § 37 (see, Matter of Adams-Eppes v Fulton, 195 AD2d 455; Matter of Williams v Williams, 133 AD2d 876).

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Santucei and Lerner, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 A.D.2d 288, 665 N.Y.S.2d 944, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12078, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beyers-v-thrane-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack