Beyers v. Anderson Tool Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Beyers v. Anderson Tool Co.

191 Ill. App. 124

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJanuary 25, 1915

DocketGen. No. 19,495

StatusPublished

This text of 191 Ill. App. 124 (Beyers v. Anderson Tool Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beyers v. Anderson Tool Co., 191 Ill. App. 124 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice

Brown delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Witnesses, § 281*—when documentary evidence admissible to impeach deposition. Documents which show representations by a deponent contradictory to his statements in his deposition are admissible to impeach such statements. 4. Trial,- § 245*—when statement of court as to insufficiency of data for computation of finding not ground for reversal. In an action to recover a balance claimed to be due on commissions on sales, a statement of the judge, at the earlier stages of the trial, that he did not have the data for the computation of a finding is not ground for reversal where it is not shown that he could not afterwards acquire the data.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice

Brown delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Witnesses, § 281*—when documentary evidence admissible to impeach deposition. Documents which show representations by a deponent contradictory to his statements in his deposition are admissible to impeach such statements. 4. Trial,- § 245*—when statement of court as to insufficiency of data for computation of finding not ground for reversal. In an action to recover a balance claimed to be due on commissions on sales, a statement of the judge, at the earlier stages of the trial, that he did not have the data for the computation of a finding is not ground for reversal where it is not shown that he could not afterwards acquire the data.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 Ill. App. 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beyers-v-anderson-tool-co-illappct-1915.