Beyer v. Tranellli-Ashe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Beyer v. Tranellli-Ashe

206 A.D.2d 948, 616 N.Y.S.2d 295

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 206 A.D.2d 948 (Beyer v. Tranellli-Ashe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beyer v. Tranellli-Ashe, 206 A.D.2d 948, 616 N.Y.S.2d 295 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the contention that respondent was denied her statutory right to the assignment of counsel is without merit (see, Family Ct Act § 262 [a]; Matter of Tavolacci v Garges, 124 AD2d 734, 736-737). (Appeal from Order of Onondaga County Family Court, Buck, J.— Contempt.) Present—Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the contention that respondent was denied her statutory right to the assignment of counsel is without merit (see, Family Ct Act § 262 [a]; Matter of Tavolacci v Garges, 124 AD2d 734, 736-737). (Appeal from Order of Onondaga County Family Court, Buck, J.— Contempt.) Present—Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 A.D.2d 948, 616 N.Y.S.2d 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beyer-v-tranellli-ashe-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack