Beyer v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedFebruary 27, 2024
Docket21-0101V
StatusUnpublished

This text of Beyer v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Beyer v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beyer v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2024).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-0101V

SAMUEL BEYER, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: January 26, 2024 v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, Beverly Hills, CA, for Petitioner.

Bridget Corridon, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

On January 5, 2021, Samuel Beyer (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). On May 14, 2021, he filed an amended petition. ECF No. 12. Petitioner alleged that he suffered a right shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), a defined Table injury or, in the alternative, a causation-in-fact injury, after receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on November 22, 2019. Amended Petition at 1, ¶¶ 5, 34; Stipulation, filed Jan. 26, 2024, ¶¶ 1-2, 4. Petitioner further alleged that he received the vaccine within the United States, that he suffered the residual effects of his injury for more than six months, and that neither he nor any other person has filed a civil action or received compensation for his injury. Amended Petition at ¶¶ 5, 35-37; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies that [P]etitioner sustained a SIRVA, as defined in the Table; denies that the vaccine caused [P]etitioner’s alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury;

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). and denies that his current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

Nevertheless, on January 26, 2024, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $98,500.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.

I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) SAMUEL BEYER , ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 21-I0IV v. ) Chief Special Master Corcoran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN ) ECF SERVICES, ~ Respondent. ) ______________ ) STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

I. Samuel Beyer, petitioner, filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to -34 (the "Vaccine Program").

The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt of the

influenza ("flu") vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the "Table"),

42 C.F.R. § I00.3(a).

2. Petitioner received the flu vaccination in his right arm on November 22, 2019.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that he suffered a right Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration ("SIRVA") as a result of receiving the flu vaccine within the Table time frame,

and that he experienced residual effects of this injury for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages on his behalf as a result of his condition. 6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA, as defined in the Table; denies

that the vaccine caused petitioner's alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury; and denies that

his current condition is a sequelae of a vaccine-related injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2 I (a)( 1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following compensation payment:

A lump sum of $98,500.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l 5(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry ofjudgment on entitlement in this case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before

the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this

petition.

10. Petitioner and his attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to

this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be

expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or

State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

§ 1396 et seq.)), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.

2 11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 of this Stipulation, and any amounts awarded

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atlantic & Danville Railway Co. v. West
42 S.E. 914 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Beyer v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beyer-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2024.