Beyer v. Rieter Automotive North American, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Beyer v. Rieter Automotive North American, Inc.

2012 Ohio 5627, 982 N.E.2d 708, 134 Ohio St. 3d 379

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 5, 2012

Docket2012-1283

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 2012 Ohio 5627 (Beyer v. Rieter Automotive North American, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beyer v. Rieter Automotive North American, Inc., 2012 Ohio 5627, 982 N.E.2d 708, 134 Ohio St. 3d 379 (Ohio 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal and cross-appeal are accepted. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Hewitt v. L.E. Myers, 134 Ohio St.3d 199, 2012-Ohio-5317, 981 N.E.2d 795, and judgment is entered in favor of Rieter Automotive North American, Inc.

O’Connor, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal and cross-appeal are accepted. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Hewitt v. L.E. Myers, 134 Ohio St.3d 199, 2012-Ohio-5317, 981 N.E.2d 795, and judgment is entered in favor of Rieter Automotive North American, Inc.

O’Connor, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2012 Ohio 5627, 982 N.E.2d 708, 134 Ohio St. 3d 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beyer-v-rieter-automotive-north-american-inc-ohio-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack