Beyer v. Pioneer Metal Finishing

436 N.W.2d 781, 1989 Minn. LEXIS 54, 1989 WL 19418
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedMarch 10, 1989
DocketNo. C0-88-601
StatusPublished

This text of 436 N.W.2d 781 (Beyer v. Pioneer Metal Finishing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beyer v. Pioneer Metal Finishing, 436 N.W.2d 781, 1989 Minn. LEXIS 54, 1989 WL 19418 (Mich. 1989).

Opinion

KELLEY, Justice.

This is an appeal from a Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals’ decision affirming a compensation judge’s award of temporary partial compensation. We reverse in part and affirm in part with some modification.

The employee in this case filed a claim petition for workers’ compensation benefits for injuries sustained while employed by Pioneer Metal Finishing. A compensation judge found that the employee had reached maximum medical improvement as of the date of the hearing for certain injuries and awarded temporary partial compensation at the temporary total compensation rate to be paid concurrently with economic recovery compensation. On appeal, the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals affirmed. By writ of certiorari, Pioneer Metal Finishing and its workers’ compensation liability insurer, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, have sought further review.

Pioneer Metal and Liberty Mutual initially challenge the award of temporary partial benefits at the temporary total rate beyond 90 days past maximum medical improvement; and the employee agrees that for reasons stated in Parson v. Holman Erection Company, 428 N.W.2d 72 (Minn.1988), that portion of the award of benefits was not proper. We therefore reverse the award of temporary partial benefits at the temporary total compensation rate beyond 90 days after maximum medical improvement. Pioneer Metal and Liberty Mutual have also challenged certain findings of the compensation judge. Our review of this record convinces us that the findings, as affirmed, are not manifestly contrary to the evidence. Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie Jaycees, 358 N.W.2d 54 (Minn.1984); Egeland v. City of Minneapolis, 344 N.W.2d 597 (Minn.1984). Accordingly, that portion of the award of temporary benefits preceding expiration of the 90-day period after maximum medical improvement is affirmed although we modify the award to reflect that it is payable as temporary total compensation. Redgate v. Sroga’s Standard Service, 421 N.W.2d 729 (Minn.1988); Minn.Stat. § 176.101, subd. 3e (1984).

REVERSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART.

The employee is awarded $400 in attorney fees on appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Egeland v. City of Minneapolis
344 N.W.2d 597 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1984)
Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie Jaycees
358 N.W.2d 54 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1984)
Redgate v. Sroga's Standard Service
421 N.W.2d 729 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1988)
Parson v. Holman Erection Co., Inc.
428 N.W.2d 72 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
436 N.W.2d 781, 1989 Minn. LEXIS 54, 1989 WL 19418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beyer-v-pioneer-metal-finishing-minn-1989.