Beyer v. McGeorge

Third Circuit

Beyer v. McGeorge

90 F.2d 998, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4011

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJune 11, 1937

DocketNo. 6296

StatusPublished

This text of 90 F.2d 998 (Beyer v. McGeorge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beyer v. McGeorge, 90 F.2d 998, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4011 (3d Cir. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case requires no opinion. Without reciting the facts, it suffices to say the court below rightly held that, after the expiration of the term and with no order extending the same, it had no power to set aside or alter its final judgment. To that effect is Montgomery v. Realty Acceptance Corp. (C.C.A.) 51 F.(2d) 642, affirmed in 284 U.S. 547, 52 S.Ct. 215, 76 L.Ed. 476. So holding, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case requires no opinion. Without reciting the facts, it suffices to say the court below rightly held that, after the expiration of the term and with no order extending the same, it had no power to set aside or alter its final judgment. To that effect is Montgomery v. Realty Acceptance Corp. (C.C.A.) 51 F.(2d) 642, affirmed in 284 U.S. 547, 52 S.Ct. 215, 76 L.Ed. 476. So holding, the appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 F.2d 998, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beyer-v-mcgeorge-ca3-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack