Beyer v. McGeorge

Third Circuit

Beyer v. McGeorge

90 F.2d 998, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4011

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided June 11, 1937·No. No. 6296·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case requires no opinion. Without reciting the facts, it suffices to say the court below rightly held that, after the expiration of the term and with no order extending the same, it had no power to set aside or alter its final judgment. To that effect is Montgomery v. Realty Acceptance Corp. (C.C.A.) 51 F.(2d) 642, affirmed in 284 U.S. 547, 52 S.Ct. 215, 76 L.Ed. 476. So holding, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case requires no opinion. Without reciting the facts, it suffices to say the court below rightly held that, after the expiration of the term and with no order extending the same, it had no power to set aside or alter its final judgment. To that effect is Montgomery v. Realty Acceptance Corp. (C.C.A.) 51 F.(2d) 642, affirmed in 284 U.S. 547, 52 S.Ct. 215, 76 L.Ed. 476. So holding, the appeal is dismissed.

Beyer v. McGeorge, 90 F.2d 998, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4011 (3d Cir. 1937).

Pincite

90 F.2d 998 (Beyer v. McGeorge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related