Beyda v. Board of Trustees

207 A.D.2d 517, 616 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8562
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 29, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 207 A.D.2d 517 (Beyda v. Board of Trustees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beyda v. Board of Trustees, 207 A.D.2d 517, 616 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8562 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, for declaratory relief, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated February 5, 1992, which, inter alia, declared Local Laws, 1988, No. 7-1988 of the Incorporated Village of Saddle Rock unconstitutional.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, and it is declared that Local Laws, 1988, No. 7-1988 of the Incorporated Village of Saddle Rock is not violative of the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution.

The challenged law, Local Laws, 1988, No. 7-1988 of the Incorporated Village of Saddle Rock, is not violative of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution in that the classifications established concerning who will and will not be deemed "residents” of the village for purposes of use of the village pool are not irrational and bear a reasonable relation to a legitimate governmental interest (see, Maresca v Cuomo, 64 NY2d 242; Lighthouse Shores v Town of Islip, 41 NY2d 7). We find no support for the proposition that the plaintiffs had a vested right to use the village pool (see, 16A CJS, General Considerations, § 228; 20 NY Jur 2d, Constitutional Law, §§ 301-303; Church v Church, 58 Misc 2d 753; cf., People v Miller, 304 NY 105; 12 NY Jur 2d, Buildings, Zoning, and Land Controls, § 122; 11 NY Jur 2d, Buildings, Zoning, and Land Controls, §39).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are either not properly before this Court or without merit. Lawrence, J. P., Altman, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

470 Baywalk, Inc. v. Inc. Village of Ocean Beach
226 A.D.2d 673 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 A.D.2d 517, 616 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beyda-v-board-of-trustees-nyappdiv-1994.