Bey v. Szabad

District Court, E.D. Arkansas·Decided June 21, 2024·No. 4:24-cv-00183·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION

ALI ALI BEY PLAINTIFF

No. 4:24-cv-183-DPM

RICHARD SZABAD and TRE DAVIS, Patrol Person DEFENDANTS

ORDER Summons has been returned to sender on Tre Davis. From a public records search, it appears that Officer Davis is no longer employed by the Bryant Police Department. It is Bey’s responsibility to provide valid service information for Officer Davis. Lee v. Armontrout, 991 F.2d 487, 489 (8th Cir. 1993). Bey has until 8 July 2024 to provide the Court a valid service address. The Court directs the Clerk, after Bey has supplied the address, to reissue summons for Officer Davis and deliver it, along with a copy of the complaint, amended complaint, and this Order, to the United States Marshal for service. The Marshal must serve Officer Davis by restricted delivery, return receipt requested. Bey does not have to prepay the fees and costs or security.

So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge Al fue 20aF

_2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bey v. Szabad, (E.D. Ark. 2024).

Bey v. Szabad (Bey v. Szabad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related