Bey v. Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLP

584 F. App'x 135
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 6, 2014
DocketNo. 14-1378
StatusPublished
Cited by130 cases

This text of 584 F. App'x 135 (Bey v. Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bey v. Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLP, 584 F. App'x 135 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Malik Bey appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692y (2012), the Maryland Consumer Debt Collections Act, Md.Code Ann., Com. Law, §§ 14-201 to -204, and the Maryland Consumer Protection Act, Md.Code Ann., Com. Law, §§ 13-101 to -501, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bey v. Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLP, No. 8:13-cv-01562-PWG (D. Md. Feb. 20 & Mar. 21, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
584 F. App'x 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bey-v-shapiro-brown-alt-llp-ca4-2014.