Bey v. Muldoon

354 F.2d 1005

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
• Decided: January 27, 1966
• Docket: 15133_1
• Status: Published

Opinion

354 F.2d 1005

Abdullah Ahmad BEY et al.
v.
Francis MULDOON, Alfred Corry and Stewart Sobelman, Trustees and Robert Kelly, Administrator of a Special Fund (2/5/62), et al.
Abdullah Ahmad Bey, Appellant.

No. 15133.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued September 14, 1965.

Decided January 27, 1966.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Joseph S. Lord, III, Judge.

Sidney J. Smolinsky, Philadelphia, Pa. (Bernard Sacks, Dorfman, Pechner, Sacks & Dorfman, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

William R. Deasey, Philadelphia, Pa. (Kelly, Deasey & Scanlan, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Corry, Kelly, Muldoon, Sobelman and Philadelphia Marine Trade Ass'n.

Marvin I. Barish, Philadelphia, Pa. (Abraham E. Freedman, Freedman, Borowsky & Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for ILA, Trustees of Pension Fund et al.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge and KALODNER and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Much of the previous history of this case is set out in 217 F.Supp. 401 (E.D. Pa.1962), id., 404 (E.D.Pa.1963) and 223 F.Supp. 489 (E.D.Pa.1963), and need not be repeated here. The agreement was reformed in accordance with the opinion last cited and as required by it. See id. supra, 496. An examination of the record and of the briefs and consideration of the oral arguments lead us to the conclusion that the court below committed no error. Consequently, the order of the court below requiring judgment to be entered for the defendants and dissolving the injunction restraining the transfer of money from the royalty fund will be affirmed.