Bey v. Hollenbeck

Fourth Circuit

Bey v. Hollenbeck

616 F. App'x 125

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 5, 2015·No. No. 15-6468·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sharu Bey, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible' error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bey v. Hollenbeck, No. 5:14-hc-02016-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2015). We deny Bey’s motion for bail pending appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma[126] terials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sharu Bey, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible' error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bey v. Hollenbeck, No. 5:14-hc-02016-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2015). We deny Bey’s motion for bail pending appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma[126] terials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Bey v. Hollenbeck, 616 F. App'x 125 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

616 F. App'x 125 (Bey v. Hollenbeck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related